Author: Thorsten Schwetje

While experimental data and methods are commonly reported as “best outcome” figure of merits, the systematic process parameters (while being crucial for achieved outcome, in particular in combination and chains of different process steps) are often neglected or buried in hard-to-access lab books and similar sources. This complicates and prolongs process optimization, especially when different printing and post-processing steps need to be combined for a specific application. The project ReCIPE aimed at setting up a tool for researchers and users of printed electronics that can grow into a broad open database on process parameters and connected outcomes for the wider academic and industry-based community.

Data processing is usually not a  single task, but in general relies on a chain of tools. To achieve transparency, adaptability, and reproducibility of (computational)

From its inception, members of NFDI4Ing have been working on a concept for the publication and organization of standards in the field of research data. By now, the concept is quite advanced and ready for the next step. The working group “Standardisation” (CC-5) is looking for interested persons from the community to support the work and to get the implementation underway.

The recently published “Guidelines zum Text und Data Mining für Forschungszwecke in Deutschland” describe under which conditions text and data mining may be carried out for scientific purposes and what risks exist. An online workshop, “Urheberrechtliche Fragestellungen bei der Gestaltung von Dienstleistungen zum Text und Data Mining” will take place on April 25th to address copyright issues in designing services to support text and data mining.